LEDGERsigned · hash-chained · verifiable offlinePOLICIESplain english · compiled · enforced inlineRED TEAMcontinuous adversarial probing on shadow twinsCOMPLIANCESOC 2 · GDPR · HIPAA · PCI-DSS · EU AI Act · ISO 42001INTEGRATIONgateway · SDK · sidecar · no rewritesLEDGERsigned · hash-chained · verifiable offlinePOLICIESplain english · compiled · enforced inlineRED TEAMcontinuous adversarial probing on shadow twinsCOMPLIANCESOC 2 · GDPR · HIPAA · PCI-DSS · EU AI Act · ISO 42001INTEGRATIONgateway · SDK · sidecar · no rewrites
Teleon / Blog

Agentic security, in plain terms.

Practical guidance on securing AI agents, tools, and the systems they act on, written by the team building the trust layer for AI agents.

AI Governance

AI Policy Enforcement vs Policy Documentation

A written AI policy describes intent; enforcement makes that intent operate in the running system, and an organization needs both to actually manage risk.

AI GovernanceSeptember 23, 2026
AI Governance

How to Classify AI Use Cases by Risk

Classifying AI use cases by risk should weigh action capability, data sensitivity, and reach, since these three factors predict worst-case impact better than novelty.

AI GovernanceSeptember 23, 2026
AI Governance

Building an Inventory of AI Systems and Agents

An AI inventory needs to be built through direct outreach to engineering teams, not documentation alone, and maintained as a living process rather than a one-time list.

AI GovernanceSeptember 23, 2026
AI Governance

What the EU AI Act Means for AI Application Security

The EU AI Act's risk-tiered obligations translate into concrete security and documentation work for high-risk systems, worth reviewing with counsel before scoping.

AI GovernanceSeptember 23, 2026
AI Governance

How the OWASP Guidance Applies to LLM Applications

The OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications gives teams a shared vocabulary for recurring risks like prompt injection and excessive agency, useful for review, not a checklist alone.

AI GovernanceSeptember 23, 2026
AI Governance

A Practical Introduction to the NIST AI Risk Management Framework

The NIST AI RMF organizes AI risk work into govern, map, measure, and manage functions, giving teams a shared structure without prescribing specific tools or controls.

AI GovernanceSeptember 23, 2026
AI Governance

How AI Risk Management Works in Practice

AI risk management works as a repeating cycle of identifying, assessing, treating, and monitoring risk, not a one-time assessment filed away after launch.

AI GovernanceSeptember 23, 2026
AI Governance

AI Governance vs AI Security

AI governance decides what rules apply and who is accountable; AI security implements the controls that make those rules real, and neither substitutes for the other.

AI GovernanceSeptember 23, 2026
AI Governance

What Is AI Governance?

AI governance decides who is accountable for an AI system's risk, what rules apply, and how the organization proves those rules are actually followed.

AI GovernanceSeptember 23, 2026
RAG and Data Security

A RAG Security Checklist

A consolidated RAG security checklist covering access control, ingestion, vector database hardening, multi-tenant isolation, and privacy, for a systematic review.

RAG and Data SecuritySeptember 23, 2026
RAG and Data Security

A RAG Threat Modeling Guide

Threat modeling a RAG system means mapping every source feeding retrieval, tracing access control through the pipeline, and assuming any retrieved content is untrusted.

RAG and Data SecuritySeptember 23, 2026
RAG and Data Security

How to Handle Data Subject Requests in AI Systems

Data subject requests against AI systems have to reach prompts, logs, embeddings, and fine-tuning data, not just the primary database, or the response is incomplete.

RAG and Data SecuritySeptember 23, 2026